You have to login first before submitting your work.
Discover / Meet the Artist
Interview with Yorgos Agrotes
"I am drawn to the spaces between states of being, where something is no longer what it was, but not yet what it will become."
Featuring
Discover / Meet the Artist
Featuring
The practice of Yorgos Agrotes is rooted in presence, observation, and an evolving dialogue between structure and spontaneity. With a background shaped by Cyprus, Thessaloniki, and now Athens, Agrotes navigates themes of memory, transformation, and the quiet tension between past and future. His work resists fixed narratives, instead embracing process as a site of discovery. Whether through gesture, material, or absence, Agrotes explores the invisible movements of the inner world, where identity shifts, fragments settle, and new forms begin to emerge.
✧✧✧
How has your upbringing or cultural heritage shaped the themes and techniques you explore in your art today?
I studied in Thessaloniki, Greece, a city with a rich cultural history and a small art scene that’s both vibrant and diverse. It was a place of constant dialogue between traditional influences and more contemporary approaches to art. But what truly shaped my thinking wasn’t just the environment of Thessaloniki. It was the contrast with the environment I left behind in Cyprus.
Leaving Cyprus gave me a different lens to look at things. The experience of being away, of navigating a new cultural and creative space, forced me to reconsider what I thought I knew. It made me reflect on memory, identity, and the tension between what’s left behind and what is yet to come. And right now Athens provided the space to expand my ideas, but my background in Cyprus, with its own complex histories, is what continues to drive and challenge my work.
Do you believe an artist's passion is something destined or a conscious choice?
For me, it's definitely a conscious choice. I don’t really believe in the idea of "talent" as something you're just born with. I think every human is talented in some way, it’s just a matter of what you do with it and how you feed it. Passion, especially in art, comes from how you choose to engage with the world around you. It's about perception, how you see things today, how that changes over time, and how you respond to that through your work. In my own practice, I've learned that passion isn't this magical, destined thing, it’s something you build. It’s a daily commitment to showing up, exploring, questioning, and pushing your boundaries. So no, I don’t think it’s fate. I think it’s choice, discipline, and a deep curiosity that keeps evolving.
Can you take us through the evolution of an artwork, from that first spark of inspiration to the finished piece?
It often begins with something small, a sound, a memory, a material, or even just a feeling that doesn’t quite have a name. I rarely start with a clear image in mind. Instead, I begin by reacting to something intuitively, and from there, the work starts to take shape. Mistakes and repetition are important parts of the process. I might return to the same gesture or material until it begins to speak back to me in a new way. The work slowly builds its own rules. Over time, the piece reveals where it wants to go. I just follow, disrupt, and respond until it feels like it holds the tension I’m looking for something unresolved, open, and honest.
Do academic institutions still play a vital role in shaping artists today, or hasself-taught creativity disrupted this tradition?
For me, it’s less about the institution itself and more about the people you’re surrounded by. The conversations, the critiques, the shared time, that’s what shapes you. An academic space can offer that, but it can also happen outside of it. Self-taught or academic, what matters is the community and the space for questioning, failing, and growing together.
Do you think art that is created for commercial success loses its integrity, or can it still hold meaning?
There’s a thin line you can try to do both, but that’s where it gets difficult. The challenge is in finding the limits, knowing when something starts to shift away from honesty. Art can still hold meaning even within commercial contexts, but it depends on the intention and awareness behind it. If you’re too focused on how something will sell, it can start to shape the work in ways that feel less genuine. It’s not about rejecting success, but about staying close to what first made the work necessary.
Under what circumstances do you think art risks becoming pretentious?
Art becomes pretentious when it tries too hard to appear meaningful without actually feeling anything. When it hides behind language, theory, or aesthetics without real urgency or honesty behind it. For me, if the work forgets its need to connect on a physical, emotional, or even uncomfortable level, it starts to drift into performance for the sake of being seen as "smart" or "deep." That’s when it loses something real.
Is art created for the artist, the audience, or somewhere in between?
I think it lives somewhere in between. It often starts with something personal, something I need to express, process, or understand. But once it leaves the studio, it doesn’t belong only to me anymore. The audience brings their own meaning, memory, and interpretation. That space between the artist’s intention and the viewer’s experience is where the real work happens.
In an increasingly globalised world, how can artists preserve authenticity and cultural integrity in their work?
Everyone carries their own truth. Even if we go through the same event, we each experience it differently, and that’s where authenticity lives. It’s not about representing a culture as a fixed identity, but about being honest with your own perspective, memory, and questions. That personal layer is what keeps the work real and unique, even in a global context.
What is the most essential message or emotion you aim to convey through your practice?
I explore the shifting nature of identity, memory, and transformation. I am drawn to the spaces between states of being, where something is no longer what it was, but not yet what it will become.
Through material, form, and gesture, I try to trace the invisible movements of the inner world: the way emotions, histories, and (back story) bodies carry, dissolve, and rebuild themselves over time. I want to speak to the quiet resilience that lives inside vulnerability. My work is a way to hold space for complexity for sorrow, tenderness, rupture, and repair to exist together. Through an engagement with process, fragmentation, and gesture, I seek to trace the slow, often invisible architectures of emotional and corporeal change. My work does not aim to illustrate these movements but rather to inhabit them: to give form to the unformed, and to attend to the spaces where language, memory, and the body falter.
Thematically, my inquiry is less about arriving at a fixed meaning and more about holding space for instability itself, as both an existential condition and a generative force. At its core, my work is an investigation into the radical potentiality of vulnerability. Rather than framing fragility as a deficit, I approach it as a site of profound agency: a condition through which rupture, exposure, and uncertainty become openings for transformation. I seek to create spaces of encounter where grief, tenderness, loss, and resilience can coexist without resolution, offering viewers an invitation to dwell in complexity rather than to transcend it. In a cultural moment that privileges coherence, legibility, and productivity, my work proposes an alternate ethics, one that values the fragment, the unfinished, the unresolved.
Ultimately, I am interested in how states of fragmentation, both personal and collective, might serve not as endpoints, but as beginnings: fragile, incomplete, yet charged with the possibility of becoming otherwise.
✦ ✦ ✦
For Agrotes, painting is not about resolution, but resonance. It is a space where clarity gives way to complexity, and where vulnerability becomes a source of strength. Through disciplined inquiry and raw instinct, his work reflects a commitment to authenticity, one that honours emotion, memory, and the many lives art can hold. In each composition lies an invitation: to pause, reflect, and engage with the unfinished. To see art not as a destination, but as a way of being with what cannot always be named.